Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts

Saturday, June 22, 2013

C'est Quoi Un Père?

Written to: Broken by Fabrizio Paterlini

A father is the first living relative a child forms an immediate bond with next to the mother who bore it for 9 months.  If you're a boy, a father to you is your partner by anatomical make-up first and foremost, and that initial partnership paves the way for other forms of  deep-rooted relations. If you're a girl, a father to you is the first man you fall in love with. The first man who teaches you what it is to be a man and how to treat a lady. The man whose actions and presence will later on shape your future encounters with other men. If your dad went out of his way to be a hero in your eyes, then you will surely see the good in every man that is to come after him, and compare that to a golden standard of love and affection. If your dad left your side, whether by choice or fate, then how can you ever know what that primal bond between a father and daughter is? If it was never granted, you start to search for it elsewhere. You start to ask for it from men who can't give it to you, because that is not their role in your life. Whether their current role is that of a friend or a lover or a teacher, you can't ask for that kind of elevated unrequited affection from these men. It is too heavy a burden to place on them. It is too difficult and painful for them to fill a void that has been empty for several years. Where do they begin? Or moreover, how do they begin? Is that why those relationships are doomed to fail? Because they can't give you the pseudo-paternalistic care that you need, or rather because you require too much of their ongoing presence in your life to feed your cycle of round the clock emotional instability?

A father is someone who won't mind you needing him all the time. It is he who welcomes your attachment with open arms, and then it is up to you to choose whether you want to thrive on that attachment or retract from it. In the Arab/Muslim world, children who lost both parents are called orphans. Children who lost only their fathers are also called "orphans", but not children who lost their mothers. Why is that? Why are we, the children of widows, considered along with those who have never known a loving touch from a father or mother? It became clear to me recently that it's because the child orphaned of a father is deprived from such a vital type of attachment, one that is sturdy and unshakable. It doesn't matter if it's an aggressive attachment or a delicate one, it is one that remains with you wherever you go, and imprints on your behavior and regard towards others.The same challenges will always face those who grow up without a father or a mother, but not having the former, means no one will readily step up to fill those shoes and be your hero. Men in general already have a hard time accommodating any kind of emotional vacancy, let alone an emotional vacancy of such magnitude. I recall feeling so angry when people called me an "orphan", since to me, the word had such a negative connotation. Ironically, it had an emasculating effect on me. It meant that such a person had no one, was unloved and unwanted, and I knew that wasn't my case when my mother always gave me the care and protection I needed. She was both the father and the mother, and I always thought I could rely on my uncles from both sides as accessories. As I grew older, I learned to belligerently accept that degrading attribute unto me. One reason for that was that I would glimpse a light twinkle in my uncles' eyes whenever they would speak about their daughters, and the pang of hurt and jealousy that accompanied those stares. Despite all the care and support they've given me hitherto, I always lacked one thing: Uniqueness. I would always have to share that twinkle with someone, hence I was not unique and I certainly did not belong to anyone. I just desired my own twinkle and a protector of my own. I wanted to be selfish because a basic right of mine had been snatched away from me. Selfishness was the mildest reaction anyone could have towards such an injustice. As a result of this selfishness and unwillingness to share, I was paving the way for resentment and aloofness from these pseudo-fathers. I always considered myself like everyone else, even though I was not the product of an orthodox family structure. But after seeing a friend of mine being held in a tight embrace by her father who was not regarding any of the other girls in the room but his own, I knew I would forever remain ostracized from that feeling, and thus I was different by default. That gesture made me feel something unfamiliar. At that moment, I wished for nothing more than to be in her place and to be held like that even for just a split second. I guess I just wanted to be aware of the difference between the nature of that embrace and an embrace that will inevitably lead to shame and regret. A father is someone who would rather be slaughtered than to see his own flesh and blood exploited. A father is someone who will be your platonic male friend and confidant and number one supporter so you wouldn't try to compensate such esteem by other means. What is unconditional love stemming from a man? Why do I have such a skewed perception of men now? I think they all have ill intentions and mean no good. I had just begun to develop a tiny crush on one of my professors, and the first time I went to see him in his office, he was raving on and on about his 4-year-old daughter, and that nauseated me more than it should have appealed to me. From that moment on, I despised him to the very core, but at the same time I also envied his daughter for the fucking amazing hero who took pride in her.
"My dear little girl, know that all souls are meant to be gone. So do not be overwhelmed with
beautiful forbearance for the great one who has been stricken.
Say, if you call me from behind your conserved veil
and I failed to answer you
Just know that, Abou Firas [Al Hamadani] the finest of all men
Also had his youth stripped from him"

Can the dead really communicate with their loved ones even after they depart this earth? We can hear and feel and see memories of them ingrained within, but is it possible to be able to connect with their world and make a new memory? I came to have faith in that, after I found this letter bearing these morose lines of poetry several years after my father's passing. By the illegible handwriting, I know they must have been written by father on his deathbed. I read them every night, and I marvelled at the ink that bled these lines of pain and love. I wondered about the hand that wrote them; the creases on its palm and the texture of the skin enveloping it. How did he know I would be in such pain? How did he know I was going to long for him and call his name to no avail? Did he express a wish for me to be veiled because he knew that his absence meant my judgment would be impaired in my frantic search for someone like him? Did he compare himself to a poet who lost his life at the peak of his youth because he knew this wasn't his time yet? How was he right about all these things? I was making rosy-eyed speculations on what it means to be a father, when all along I had this piece of paper as the most genuine and sincere of testaments. To be a father to your daughter, is to experience the pain she will experience when you are not there anymore. To be a father is to succeed in making her feel loved and looked after through the sole power of your potent words. To be a father means to recognize her neediness and attachment and turn a blind eye from it because your hands are tied, your time has come, but still shame overcomes you for not fulfilling your duty. You don't have to be to be a father to me. I'll never know your embrace or your scent or your voice, but I am left with your resolve, and that is good enough for the time being. I'll still be on my search to find the closest living thing to you, and if he should reject me as well, I will pray to God to reunite us in the hereafter. So until then, why would I need cheap substitutes and fleeting replacements when I am promised the real thing?...When I am promised you?

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

How We Went from Carpe Diem to YOLO: The Downfall of Consciousness

Oscar Knows...

With more people listing YOLOOOO as their life mantra while falling under the illusion that Carpe Diem is a kind of Italian pasta, the need to say something about it struck me as somewhat necessary. 

To provide you with some perspective on the abysmal direction which our society is heading in: A couple of days ago I found out Jason Silva was giving a seminar in Abu Dhabi for IBM Software Day and was staying in Dubai afterwards. In an attempt to explain Silva's magnitude think Richard Dawkins meets Ashton Kutcher . That kind of places him on the same pedestal as any huge celeb out there, seeing as he has 30k followers on twitter. But of course I only found out he was in town through his personal twitter account and not thanks to any trivial media coverage. For some reason though, media coverage starts to resemble a 3-day Indian wedding festivity when Kimmie or Paris grace us with their presence which is almost always tied with how much revenue their  widely publicized sojourn generates for the UAE. If that isn't enough, you'll also probably see the same story appearing in three different sources, of how well Kardashian wore that local Emirati dress and how she could totally pull off her own Aabaya fashion line. Again, this is just an example of how blindly people follow a trend. It is none of my concern if you are a legit follower of celebs and all their news. It is my every concern, however, to point out that even indifferent people find themselves coerced into this trivial cyclone of "trending" news just by the exaggerated media hype. Just typing this is giving me an aneurism. I think you all get the point I'm attempting to drive home so I'll just stop here. 

That being said, if I have to see one more Harlem Shake video being shared on Facebook I'm going to lose my mind!! Sure it was fun the first couple of times watching people manically humping air which made me feel like I was part of some orgy on LSD. However, the degree to which our idiotic species manage to saturate and completly drain a certain a trend makes me not only abhor that trending phenomenon but also the very individuals responsible for it going "viral". In turn, such frustration leaves me wondering how to make the outbreak of a new plague seem like an accident. 

Yes, that crazy gangnam dance was cute in a way that showed song lyrics don't really matter as long as there's a fab Korean guy doing fancy footwork in a Korean horse stable. So what if Honey Boo Boo Child's mom has a boyfriend and I'm still single as f***? Ok, and maybe I would have actually appealed to the Harlem Shake if my pathetic excuse of a campus partook in the madness... And lo and behold, all these acknowledgments still leave this question unanswered: Where do we go from here? 

What does it mean when an Internet phenomenon manages to awe and impress 1/7th of the worl'd population? Not only did we become so entirely consumed with discussing these global phenomena and actively "trending" them online, but more importantly we lost sight of the events that weren't as popular but which were more deserving of our attention and cyber activism. For instance, how many people knew that World Cancer Day was just 4 days into February? How many people actually gave a shit that Valentine's Day marked the first day of Palestine Awareness Week? What about the meteorite that hit Saudi Arabia a few days ago? or the fact that Abu Dhabi is now granting blue-collar workers a proper weekend? Human beings that are a part of this society, planet, and universe, can either be one of three things: A. Happy-go-lucky kind of people who would rather go with the natural flow of things because they're already overwhelmed with their own problems to divert their attention to other wordly matters OR B. Secretly informed, but they choose to be non-chalant  because they have a certain image to uphold, in which case they are hypocrits OR C. Fully aware of what's going on outside that circle of trending pop songs, videos, fluff news, and TV shows, but they think of such matters as a waste of time, and whoever dare diverge from whatever has gotten the majority's stamp of approval must be a loser, in which case I'd like to say to these people: CONGRATULATIONS! You are at the very bottom of Mother Nature's hierarchy of organization.


Ultimately, we live in a dog-eat-dog kind of world where one doesn't stand a chance if there's no feature other than an olive-shaped mole on a calf to distinguish him/her from a throng of atypical beings. Years from now, do we really want our future children to remember the uniqueness of our glorious youth with the story of that one time when we were so torn apart with which Instagram filter to apply on this one picture of food which then ended up getting 100+ likes, regardless? No one is asking you to join a cult or highten your eccentricity to the point of agressiveness. Just be aware. Be multi-faceted. Don't follow unless it is with the power of your own free will. One doesn't have to read volumes of books on philosophy or Darwinism to achieve that. As the self-explanatory Jamaican proverb says " Small small catch monkey". One Facebook page here, a retweet of a powerful quote from there, and one's consciousness becomes sensitized to the point where anything ordinary or banal no longer satisfies hungry curiosity. We should have utter faith that this strategy will serve our own wellbeing in the long-run. Each person will have a brimful to offer in terms of gregarious personality and witty discourse. Those with elevated consciousness won't panic all of a sudden when thrown into an unfamilair social/professional setting because they actually took the time to master the specific set of skills required to improve their understanding and perception of the world beyond its visible peripheries. They won't merely survive because they've learned to quickly adapt to change, but they will thrive in every aspect imaginable! Trust that those souls that merely exist without living, that talk without speaking, that hear without listening, that look without seeing, that feel without moving, are all doomed to perish in an evolutionary sense. But believe with every fiber in your being, that after waking up no one ever goes back to sheep. 


It's been said that modern humans nowadays
have an underdeveloped temporal lobe
Can you guess which area that represents?